SliTaz Repositories

     1.1 --- a/pcre-dev/receipt	Sun Oct 16 23:12:55 2011 +0000
     1.2 +++ b/pcre-dev/receipt	Sun Oct 16 23:14:21 2011 +0000
     1.3 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
     1.4  # SliTaz package receipt.
     1.5  
     1.6  PACKAGE="pcre-dev"
     1.7 -VERSION="8.12"
     1.8 +VERSION="8.13"
     1.9  CATEGORY="development"
    1.10  SHORT_DESC="Perl Compatible Regular Expressions devel files."
    1.11  MAINTAINER="pankso@slitaz.org"

     2.1 --- a/pcre/receipt	Sun Oct 16 23:12:55 2011 +0000
     2.2 +++ b/pcre/receipt	Sun Oct 16 23:14:21 2011 +0000
     2.3 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
     2.4  # SliTaz package receipt.
     2.5  
     2.6  PACKAGE="pcre"
     2.7 -VERSION="8.12"
     2.8 +VERSION="8.13"
     2.9  CATEGORY="system-tools"
    2.10  SHORT_DESC="Perl Compatible Regular Expressions."
    2.11  MAINTAINER="pankso@slitaz.org"
    2.12 @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
    2.13  compile_rules()
    2.14  {
    2.15  	cd $src
    2.16 +	# http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1136
    2.17 +	patch -Np2 -i $stuff/r661.diff
    2.18 +	sed -i '12140d' testdata/testoutput2
    2.19  	./configure --enable-utf8 $CONFIGURE_ARGS &&
    2.20  	make && make install
    2.21  }

     3.1 --- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
     3.2 +++ b/pcre/stuff/r661.diff	Sun Oct 16 23:14:21 2011 +0000
     3.3 @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
     3.4 +--- code/trunk/pcre_compile.c	2011/08/02 11:00:40	654
     3.5 ++++ code/trunk/pcre_compile.c	2011/08/21 09:00:54	661
     3.6 +@@ -2295,8 +2295,13 @@
     3.7 + A user pointed out that PCRE was rejecting [:a[:digit:]] whereas Perl was not.
     3.8 + It seems that the appearance of a nested POSIX class supersedes an apparent
     3.9 + external class. For example, [:a[:digit:]b:] matches "a", "b", ":", or
    3.10 +-a digit. Also, unescaped square brackets may also appear as part of class
    3.11 +-names. For example, [:a[:abc]b:] gives unknown class "[:abc]b:]"in Perl.
    3.12 ++a digit. 
    3.13 ++
    3.14 ++In Perl, unescaped square brackets may also appear as part of class names. For
    3.15 ++example, [:a[:abc]b:] gives unknown POSIX class "[:abc]b:]". However, for
    3.16 ++[:a[:abc]b][b:] it gives unknown POSIX class "[:abc]b][b:]", which does not
    3.17 ++seem right at all. PCRE does not allow closing square brackets in POSIX class 
    3.18 ++names.
    3.19 + 
    3.20 + Arguments:
    3.21 +   ptr      pointer to the initial [
    3.22 +@@ -2314,6 +2319,7 @@
    3.23 +   {
    3.24 +   if (*ptr == CHAR_BACKSLASH && ptr[1] == CHAR_RIGHT_SQUARE_BRACKET)
    3.25 +     ptr++;
    3.26 ++  else if (*ptr == CHAR_RIGHT_SQUARE_BRACKET) return FALSE;   
    3.27 +   else
    3.28 +     {
    3.29 +     if (*ptr == terminator && ptr[1] == CHAR_RIGHT_SQUARE_BRACKET)